Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Calibration

From My Perspective - - -

Calibration is a word that has been in the news recently. It means: 1) to determine, check, or rectify the graduation of (any instrument giving quantitative measurements); 2) to divide or mark with gradations, graduations, or other indexes of degree, quantity, etc., as on a thermometer, measuring cup, or the like; 3) to determine the correct range for (an artillery gun, mortar, etc.) by observing where the fired projectile hits; 4) to plan or devise (something) carefully so as to have a precise use, application, appeal, etc.: a sales strategy calibrated to rich investors. When the President chose comment on the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr., this well-scripted man departed from his use of a teleprompter to draw a conclusion that was lacking in detail and fact. By saying the Cambridge Police “acted stupidly” when they arrested his Professor friend, he needlessly inflamed the incident. In his attempt to back-track from what he had said, the President commented: “I should have calibrated my words differently.” Once again we are privy to the nuanced world of government-speak (Nuanced means: a subtle or slight degree of difference, as in meaning, feeling, or tone; a gradation; expression or appreciation of subtle shades of meaning, feeling, or tone). To ameliorate this situation, the President has invited the Policeman and the Professor to the White House for a Beer. Is that transferable as a solution for the tensions in the world – Drink More Beer? I doubt it!

The United States General Services Administration maintains a Bureau of Standards and Measurements. It is the place where The Standard is maintained for everything measurable – screw threads, rulers, yarn, resistance of grease to water, polyester fiber content, Opacity of Textile Materials to Light of Visible Wavelengths, and the list goes on almost endlessly. The point is – there is a standard that is inviolate and non-amendable. It is the absolute standard by which everything else is measured. If for some reason The Standard becomes compromised, then subjectivism enters and we no longer know or have an Absolute Standard. Ultimately, chaos would ensue. We have an expression “moving the goal-posts” that simply means: “The figurative use that alludes to the perceived unfairness in changing the goal one is trying to achieve after the process one is engaged in has already started.” In practical terms, it makes it more difficult to achieve the goal, or speak definitively, or function purposefully.

In May 2004, Cal Thomas posted a column in the Jewish World Review commenting an the changing standard for marriage in our nation. He wrote: “The Book of Judges…said it best: In those days there were no kings and everyone did what was right in his own eyes. Once that shift has taken place in sufficient numbers, once we become indifferent to immutable truths, the floodtide is not a matter of if but when. Legally, the shift began in 1993 when the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that barring same-sex couples from marrying might violate the state constitution's prohibition on sexual discrimination and must be justified by a compelling reason. Morally, the earthquake occurred much earlier. The shift from personal responsibility, accountability, putting the greater good before personal pleasure, affluence and feelings, and what once was known as the fear of God began following World War II. Consumption and pleasure replaced self-control and acting on behalf of the general welfare. Trying to remind us of the benefits of restraint in 1979…late Bishop Fulton J. Sheen delivered an address in Washington in which he asked how a football field is defined. By its boundaries, he said. There are now no boundaries in America. Any rule is potentially viewed as oppressive and any law - whether legal or moral - is up for debate, negotiation and overturning if it impedes a single individual from fulfilling his or her desire.”

In Deuteronomy 5:1-6, there is a clear declaration: “Moses summoned all Israel and said: Hear, O Israel, the decrees and laws I declare in your hearing today. Learn them and be sure to follow them. The Lord our God made a covenant with us…with all of us who are alive here today. The Lord spoke to you…And He said: I am the Lord your God…” Following these words are the reiteration of the Ten Commandments – God’s Standard for what we are to believe about God, and what duties God requires of man. If one chooses to ignore God’s Standards, he does so to his own peril, and chaos results. Consider these things with me.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Puzzled

From My Perspective - - -

Broken Lives! Broken Homes! Broken Families! Broken Relationships! Broken Hearts! People and Things that are broken are everywhere. Disruptions in the ebb and flow of life is becoming too common place. Disregard for values and valuables is lost amid the prevailing self-centeredness. The ability to care is suppressed and the need to be someone, somewhere has surfaced. The rampant slaughter of people in other nations; the disregard of the environment; the mounting abortion rate; the decline of charitable concern and giving – these and many other symptoms are realities.

How can we shift from where we are to where we need to be? How can the thinking of young and old alike return to the basic decency and values of and for life? Part of what is in the air is arrogance on one hand, and a sense of abandonment (giving up) on the other hand. A commentator stated about our President: “His intelligence is only exceeded by his arrogance.” Can it be that the population feels or believes they are losing far more than they are gaining in 2009? Are lives filled more with uncertainty than they are with hopefulness? The Homes, Savings, Investments, Retirement, Care for the Aged, Integrity, etc. are all slipping away and the future is just one large and glaring Question Mark?

Last Friday (July 24, 2009), Peggy Noonan wrote in her column entitled: “COMMON SENSE MAY SINK OBAMA-CARE”: “I think the plan is being slowed and may well be stopped not by ideology, or even by philosophy in a strict sense, but by simple American common sense. I suspect voters, the past few weeks, have been giving themselves an internal Q-and-A that goes something like this: Will whatever health care bill is produced by Congress increase the deficit? “Of course.” Will it mean tax increases? “Of course.” Will it mean new fees or fines? “Probably.” Can I afford it right now? “No, I’m already getting clobbered.” Will it make the marketplace freer and better? “Probably not.” Is our health-care system in crisis? “Yeah, it has been for years.” Is it the most pressing crisis right now? “No, the economy is.” Will a health-care bill improve the economy? “I doubt it.”

And then she summarizes about unnecessary intrusions: “Let me throw forward three other things that I suspect lessen, or will lessen, support for full health-care reform, two of them not quantifiable. The first has to do with the doctors throughout the country who give patients a break, who quietly under-bill someone they know is in trouble, or don’t charge for their services…People are afraid of losing the parts of the system that sometimes work—the unquantifiable parts, the human parts. Second, and this is big, some of the bills being worked on in Congress will allow for or mandate taxpayer funding of abortion. Speaking only and narrowly in political terms, this is so ignorant as to be astounding…The third point is largely unspoken but I suspect gives some people real pause. We are living in a time in which educated people who are at the top of American life feel they have the right to make very public criticisms of…let’s call it the private, pleasurable but health-related choices of others. They shame smokers and the overweight. Drinking will be next…So this might be an unarticulated public fear: When everyone pays for the same health-care system, the overseers will feel more and more a right to tell you how to live, which simple joys are allowed and which are not…” Compassion and care will be absent - self-centeredness and self-assertive will be present.

Puzzlement seems all-too-natural these days. A turning point in the campaign of Bill Clinton came when he said to a questioner: “I feel your pain!” Today we get the sense: “You really don’t have pain – I have a program to pass!” Broken Hearts and Disregard/Disrespect are realities. What is the only sure hope for the disenfranchised and the brokenhearted? In PSALM 34:18, we read: “The Lord is close to the brokenhearted and saves those who are crushed in spirit.” I hope the Lord acts quickly in this regard – I know some who are enduring the disappointment, discouragement and a broken-heart right now! The government cannot help in this regard, but neither should they compound one’s life with added burdens, costs and loss. Puzzled by it all? Yes! Hopeful in the Lord? Absolutely! Consider these things with me!

Thursday, July 23, 2009

The Final Exit

From My Perspective - - -

Death can many times be gruesome but always a reminder to all of the temporary characteristic of life. Death is the common denominator for all. A word that has been used in news items recently is “pandemic” when the prospect of Swine Flu is being discussed. A “pandemic” is: “An epidemic that spreads over a very wide area, such as an entire country or continent.” Examples are: "The deathly horrors of the 14th century such as recurring famines; the Hundred Years' War in France; and, most of all, the Black Death, were culturally digested throughout Europe. The omnipresent possibility of sudden and painful death increased the religious desire for penitence…"

"The Black Death was one of the deadliest “pandemics” in human history, peaking in Europe between 1348 and 1350. It is widely thought to have been an outbreak of bubonic plague… The Black Death was, according to chronicles, characterized by buboes (swellings in lymph nodes), like the late eighteenth-century Asian bubonic plague. Usually thought to have started in Central Asia, it had reached the Crimea by 1346 and from there…it spread throughout the Mediterranean and Europe. The Black Death is estimated to have killed 30% to 60% of Europe's population, reducing the world's population from an estimated 450 million to between 350 and 375 million in 1400…The plague returned at various times, resulting in a larger number of deaths, until it left Europe in the nineteenth century."

Some music that was evoked in The Black Death period is similar to the Danse Macabre (Dance of Death) – a Symphonic Poem by Saint-SaĆ«ns (1874). “It is based on a poem by Henri Cazalis in which Death the Fiddler summons skeletons from their graves at midnight to dance...It consists of the personified death leading a row of dancing figures from all walks of life to the grave, typically with an emperor, king, youngster, and beautiful girl—all skeletal. They were produced to remind people of how fragile their lives and how vain the glories of earthly life were. The dance-with-death allegory was originally a didactic play to remind people of the inevitability of death and to advise them strongly to be prepared all times for death.”

A grim reminder of The Black Death “pandemic” is a Rhyme often sung by children: “Ring around the rosy; A pocketful of posies’; Ashes, Ashes’; We all fall down!” Historically, “The words to the Ring Around The Rosy children's ring game have their origin in English history. The historical period dates back to the Great Plague of London in 1665 (bubonic plague) or even before when the first outbreak of the Plague hit England in the 1300's. The symptoms of the plague included a rosy red rash in the shape of a ring on the skin (Ring around the rosy). Pockets and pouches were filled with sweet smelling herbs (or posies) which were carried due to the belief that the disease was transmitted by bad smells. The term "Ashes Ashes" refers to the cremation of the dead bodies; We all fall down refers to people who were dropping dead! The plague was only halted by the Great Fire of London in 1666 which killed the rats which carried the disease which was transmitted via water sources…or violent sneezing…”

In the news today, we read about the loneliness of death, and the concern about a new “pandemic” possibility: (1) "The poor economy is taking a toll even on the dead, with an increasing number of bodies in Los Angeles County going unclaimed by families who cannot afford to bury or cremate their loved ones. At the county coroner's office…36% more cremations were done at taxpayers' expense in the last fiscal year over the previous year, from 525 to 712", and (2) "Swine flu has spurred the Church of England to revive a rule drawn up more than 450 years ago when bubonic plague swept the land. As concern mounts about the spread of the virus…some Anglican churches have begun to allow “intinction” or dipping bread in communion wine rather than sharing the chalice, while others have stopped offering wine…” An obvious conclusion is: Life is temporary – Death is a certainty. In James 4:14 the question is posed: “What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.” And in Psalm 90:10-12, “The length of our days is seventy years, or eighty, if we have the strength…Teach us to number our days aright, that we may gain a heart of wisdom.” Are you prepared for Death and Eternity? Consider these things with me.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Just Too Many Of...

From My Perspective - - -

Too many Foreclosures; too many Bank Failures; too many Crimes and Murders; too many Unemployed – just too many of can be attached to almost any situation and consideration. For instance, Johann Hari wrote in the London Independent on November 15, 2008 (later appearing on The Huffington Post)the column: “ARE THERE JUST TOO MANY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD?” He writes: This is a post I don't want to write. Its subject is ugly; it makes me instinctively recoil…The subject is overpopulation. Is our planet over-stuffed with human beings? Are we breeding to excess? These questions are increasingly poking into public debate, and from odd directions. Phillip Mountbatten…said in a documentary screened this week: ‘The food prices are going up, and everyone thinks it's to do with not enough food, but it's really [that there are] too many people. It's a little embarrassing for everybody, nobody knows how to handle it.’ …The overpopulation lobby say this will inevitably leave more and more people chasing after a diminishing amount of resources on an ecologically-ravaged planet. At their most pessimistic, they say human beings will, in the long sweep of planetary history, look like a big-brained version of a locust cloud. They eat everything in sight and multiply fifty-fold until they have consumed everything, when they turn in desperation on each other, munch off their siblings' heads, and then fall out of the sky dead. They say with a frown that this global swarming is driving global warming. How can you be prepared to cut back on your car emissions and your plane emissions but not on your baby emissions? Can you really celebrate the pitter-patter of tiny carbon-footprints?”

Yesterday (July 20th),The Patriot Post reported:“…Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in Sunday's New York Times Magazine: 'Frankly I had thought that at the time (Roe v. Wade) was decided…there was concern about population growth and PARTICULARLY GROWTH IN POPULATIONS THAT WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE TOO MANY OF.' The comment…was in the context of Medicaid funding for abortion. Ginsburg was surprised when the Supreme Court in 1980 barred taxpayer support for abortions for poor women. After all, IF POVERTY PARTLY DESCRIBED THE POPULATION YOU HAD 'TOO MANY OF,' you would want to subsidize it in order to expedite the reduction of unwanted populations. Left unclear is whether Ginsburg endorses the eugenic (relating or adapted to the production of good or improved offspring) motivation she ascribed to the passage of Roe v. Wade or whether she was merely objectively describing it…” Just as an aside, one is forced to wonder where this notion of “JUST TOO MANY OF” appear in the Constitution of the USA.

Life is something that should be cherished. It should be lived and used for noble purposes. In our world during the last 100 years, Millions have died because of War; more than 40 million because of Abortion; Countless numbers in Massacres and Murders; and the Holocaust. On the website – www.deathcamps.info – one can find the number of deaths listed country by country occupied by Germany. A summary paragraph states: ”The European Jews were the primary victims of the Holocaust. But Jews were not the only group singled out for persecution by Hitler’s Nazi regime. As many as one-half million Gypsies, at least 250,000 mentally or physically disabled persons, and more than three million Soviet prisoners-of-war also fell victim to Nazi genocide. Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, Social Democrats, Communists, partisans, trade unionists, Polish intelligentsia and other undesirables were also victims of the hate and aggression carried out by the Nazis.” While many are appalled by the number of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is almost an air of indifference in our country when it comes to DUI deaths; inner-city murders; and currently, deaths as a result of those text-messaging while driving and/or preoccupied with a Cell Phone conversation.

It was God’s idea for His Creation to be fruitful and multiply (The Cultural Mandate – Genesis 1:28). There is also the instruction to care for the creation/environment. Pollution is a result of man’s recklessness and carelessness. Such behavior is governed by the “I have a right to” attitude and the thoughtlessness on the part of too many in terms of what is being left for future generations. Simple things, such as recycling, composting, cultivating, and non-littering can be a starting point for all. The focus needs to be changed to – Just Too Many Of – who don’t care about the world in which we live. Consider these things with me!

Monday, July 20, 2009

Moonstruck

From My Perspective - - -

Forty years ago today, the world, more than 500 million people, was mesmerized as the United States attempted a Lunar Landing. With all of the planning for this journey to the Moon and a possible landing on its surface, there were still split second decisions that had to be made in terms of whether or not the mission should be aborted. However, the descent to the surface of the Moon began and a world sat breathless – and then the words were heard – The Eagle Was Landed! Then the infamous words by Neil Armstrong as his feet touched the surface of the Moon: “That’s one small step for man; one giant leap for mankind.” This statement demonstrates that even a courageous Astronaut, in the excitement and pressure of such a great venture, can be “Moonstruck” momentarily. He had intended to say: “That’s one small step for “a” man…” More meaning has been attached to the missing “a” than it deserves,

There has always been interest and fascination with space. Approximately 1500 BC, the Psalmist wrote about his ponderings in Psalm 8:3-4, “When I consider your heavens, the work of your fingers, THE MOON AND THE STARS, which you have set in place, what is man that you are mindful of him, the son of man that you care for him?” In Luke 21:20-28 (NLT), Jesus is addressing what will occur very near to the climax of the world and creation: “And when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then you will know that the time of its destruction has arrived…And there will be strange events in the skies – SIGNS IN THE SUN, MOON, AND STARS. And down here on earth the nations will be in turmoil, perplexed by the roaring seas and strange tides. The courage of many people will falter because of the fearful fate they see coming upon the earth, because the stability of the very heavens will be broken up.” There is ample warning when the end is approaching as the lights begin to go out in the universe: “Then the fourth angel blew his trumpet, and one-third of the sun was struck, and ONE-THIRD OF THE MOON, and one-third of the stars, and they BECAME DARK. And one-third of the day was dark and one-third of the night also.”

A recent E-mail shared this perspective for consideration: “Do you not know? Do you not hear? Has it not been told you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? It is He Who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; Who brings princes to nothing, and makes the rulers of the earth as emptiness. Scarcely are they planted, scarcely sown, scarcely has their stem taken root in the earth, when He blows on them, and they wither, and the tempest carries them off like stubble. - Isaiah 40:21-24. Worried about world powers? World War 3? Terrorists? Market crashes? Biological warfare? Understand this from Isaiah : "[God] reduces rulers to nothing, Who makes the judges of the earth meaningless." What ever happened to Napoleon? Didn’t he die in exile on an island somewhere? Or Alexander, the not-so Great? Hitler? Or the maniac leaders of our generation ”Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein? Their influence is hardly a blip on God’s monitor. They may cause us to bite our nails and worry, but God isn’t pacing, or wringing His hands; just as soon as He’s ready He will reduce those leaders to nothing…Isaiah says in effect, 'Don’t you get it?' God doesn’t read the New York Times. If He did, it wouldn’t make any difference. Nothing stops God's unalterable purposes in this world!”

The E-mail continues: “I can’t wait for that day in heaven when we get to hear history’s real story when we read God’s script and realize all He was doing behind the scenes. Just imagine the drama of God’s continuous all-wise intervention in the sinful machinations of human armies and governments. To think that not one of His purposes is ever delayed or frustrated, not even for a moment. We will be amazed, stunned, and captured by God’s awesome control of human affairs. Isaiah says of world rulers, "Scarcely have they been planted. Scarcely have they been sown. Scarcely has their stock taken root in the earth. God just blows on them and they’re gone.” Walter Cronkite would close his newscast: “And That’s The Way It Is!” - that's how it is! Consider these things with me!

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Happiness Happening

From My Perspective - - -

It seems we all have the potential for making a deliberate choice to (a) Be Happy, or (b) Be Sad (or Miserable). All kinds of books written by Psychologists, Psychiatrists and Clergy discuss the subject of Being Happy and Finding Happiness. Some of the titles are: The Secret of Happiness (Billy Graham); The Be-Happy Attitudes (Robert Schuller); or Climb Your Stairway to Heaven: The 9 Habits of Maximum Happiness (David Leonhardt).

The Mayor of Durham, NC came up with a unique idea by linking with Nickelodeon as it begins a celebration today of the 10th anniversary of Sponge-Bob Square-Pants. The headline reads: Mayor Declares A Day Of Happiness. As part of Nickelodeon’s celebration, the network has proclaimed July 17th, the first Global Day of Happiness. The proclamation reads that “…a day in honor of happiness is most appropriate due to the current affairs within our nation…The day will help recognize simple pleasures, like a smile -- the more in tune with one's happiness, the more one is inspired to commit good deeds.” It adds that “mental health is a worldwide issue, and happiness increases confidence, and self-esteem -- which leads to success, and a healthy lifestyle.” So there you have it – the searched for secret of happiness – and all it took was “…that absorbent, yellow fellow who lives in a pineapple under the sea and The Ultimate Sponge-Bob Sponge-Bash Weekend." Isn’t that an easy approach?

Perhaps – too easy! All kinds of people have attempted to offer a brief statement to define what happiness is and how it can be attained or maintained. Perhaps the most brief one was by Charles Schulz: Happiness Is A Warm Puppy. A few other expressions are by - Helen Keller: True happiness is not attained through self-gratification, but through fidelity to a worthy purpose; Mahatma Gandhi: Happiness is when what you think, what you say, and what you do are in harmony; Hugh Downs: A happy person is not a person in a certain set of circumstances, but rather a person with a certain set of attitudes; Mark Twain: Happiness ain't a thing in itself--it's only a contrast with something that ain't pleasant; Socrates: By all means marry: If you get a good wife, you'll become happy; if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher; Steven Covey: Happiness can be defined, in part at least, as the fruit of the desire and ability to sacrifice what we want now for what we want eventually.

Declaring a Day Of Happiness is fanciful - but suppose you could have A Lifetime Of Happiness – which one would you choose or want more? On the website, Reference.com, the following is stated: “While direct measurement of happiness is difficult, tools such as The Oxford Happiness Inventory have been developed by researchers. Looking for the level of happiness as reported by people and comparing it to various elements in their lives reveals the following findings: (1) About 50% of one's sadness depends on one's genes. This is shown by studying identical twins and learning that their happiness is 50% correlated even when growing up in different houses; (2) 10% to 15% percent is a result of various measurable variables, such as socioeconomic status, marital status, health, income, and others; (3) the remaining 40% results from actions that individuals deliberately engage in for the purpose of becoming happier. However, these actions may vary between persons. For example, extroverts may benefit from placing themselves in situations involving large amounts of human interaction. Also, exercise has been shown to increase one's level of well-being significantly.”

In place of Happiness, one might fin Joy to be more beneficial. Happiness depends on Happenings (variable circumstances that can be either sad or happy), whereas Joy depends upon a Relationship. In John 15:9-11 Jesus said: “Abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his love. These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may overflow.” A lifetime of Joy versus occasional Happiness – the choice should be obvious. Go with Joy! Go with Jesus! Consider these things with me!

Friday, July 17, 2009

Options Or Principles - The Political Calculus

From My Perspective - - -

In life, one’s Core Values should govern one’s actions. If one is motivated by Principle, decision-making should be fixed and clear. A Person of Principle does not allow other factors to interfere with decisions where right or wrong are at issue. A clear definition of events, circumstances and assessment should occur based upon the Core Values – and – no other calculation or consideration. One must see things clearly for what they are and not some redefined interpretation based upon imagination rather than reality.

An interesting idea in this regard is the phrase: “Tilting At Windmills” that is based on Cervantes' Don Quixote - first published in 1604, under the title The Ingenious Knight of La Mancha. A summary of this tome explains a difference between what is imagined and what is reality. “The novel recounts the exploits of would-be knight 'Don Quixote' and his loyal servant Sancho Panza who propose to fight injustice through chivalry. In the book, which also gives us the adjective quixotic (striving for visionary ideals), the hero imagines himself to be fighting giants when he attacks windmills. Just then they came in sight of thirty or forty windmills that rise from that plain. And no sooner did Don Quixote see them that he said to his squire, ‘Fortune is guiding our affairs better than we ourselves could have wished. Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them. With their spoils we shall begin to be rich for this is a righteous war and the removal of so foul a brood from off the face of the earth is a service God will bless.’ What giants? asked Sancho Panza. ‘Those you see over there with their long arms,’ replied his master. ‘Some of them have arms well nigh two leagues in length.’ Take care, sir, cried Sancho. Those over there are not giants but windmills. Those things that seem to be their arms are sails which, when they are whirled around by the wind, turn the millstone." And so, the phrase: “Tilting At Windmills” would soon be born.

As one looks at the debates and actions of both the US Congress and US Senate, one truism that becomes obvious is that too many are “Tilting At Windmills” in the decisions being reached that will impact a Nation for years and generations to come. Imagination is often allowed to supersede Reality! An illustration of Options Versus Principles appears in an Associated Press Release today, headlined: GOP SENATORS WEIGH OPTIONS IN SOTOMAYOR'S WAKE - By Jesse J. Holland. The crux of the issue is summed up in these words: “Sonia Sotomayor's success at her Supreme Court confirmation hearing has some Republicans in a tight spot, with conservative senators forced to weigh the political calculus of voting on the court's first Latina nominee, who also is the first liberal nominee in 15 years. With Democrats solidly behind the 55-year-old Sotomayor, three days of grueling questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee gave Republicans no new or damaging ammunition to use against President Barack Obama's first high-court nominee…The underlying politics are dicey for Republicans. They must be careful to keep faith with constituents like National Rifle Association members who oppose her, yet avoid offending the Hispanic voters who represent the fastest-growing segment of the electorate…”

The crucial words in terms of “Options Or Principles” are: “…some Republicans (are) in a tight spot, with conservative Senators forced to weigh the political calculus…” And, “They must be careful to keep faith with constituents like National Rifle Association members who oppose her, yet avoid offending the Hispanic voters who represent the fastest-growing segment of the electorate…” The Bible states in James 5:11-12 (The Message Translation) that which should govern deliberations and actions: “God cares, cares right down to the last detail. And since you know that he cares, let your language show it. Don't add words like ‘I swear to God’ to your own words. Don't show your impatience by concocting oaths to hurry up God. Just say 'Yes' or 'No'. Just say what is true. That way, your language can't be used against you.” One’s quandary occurs when there is vacillation between right and wrong – yes or no issues. Consider these things with me!

Thursday, July 16, 2009

How Dry I Am (Or: How Am I To Dry)

From My Perspective - - -

In these rapidly changing and serious times, one would think that Legislators at all levels of Government would be focused on the primary issues that impact the greatest number of citizens. In today’s Drudge Report, the lead items are: (1) “Massachusetts in Suit Over Cost of Universal Care”, The gist of the article pertains to: “A hospital that serves thousands of indigent Massachusetts residents sued the state on Wednesday, charging that its costly universal health care law is forcing the hospital to cover too much of the expense of caring for the poor. The hospital, Boston Medical Center, faces a $38 million deficit for the fiscal year ending in September, its first loss in 5 years. The hospital will lose more than $100 million next year because the state has lowered Medicaid reimbursement rates and stopped paying…‘reasonable costs’ for treating other poor patients. ‘We filed this suit more in sorrow than in anger,’ said…the hospital’s chief executive.” And, (2) “Terrifying 57% Tax Looms For Biggest Earners In NYC”. The gist of this item is: “Congressional plans to fund a massive health-care overhaul could have a job-killing effect on New York, creating a tax rate of nearly 60 percent for the state's top earners and possibly pressuring small-business owners to shed workers….The top rate in New York City, home to many of the state's wealthiest people, would be 58.68 percent, the Washington-based Tax Foundation said in a report yesterday.

One would have to admit that the above represents serious issues in those locales that could easily spread elsewhere in our nation. Therefore, it is of passing interest to note: A Blog from North Carolina – Capital Beat by Mark Binker – where the Blog’s purpose is: “What Our Local Officials Are Up To At The State Capital And How State Government Is Affecting Folks…”, the following was posted in the News-Record, Greensboro, North Carolina - Clothesline Bill Hung Out To Dry. “…a Greensboro Democrat, got a little bill (H 1353) through the House that would prohibit cities and counties from adopting blanket prohibitions on clotheslines. The idea, according to Harrison, is to allow people who want to save energy by hanging out their laundry (rather than use their dryers)…Originally, the bill started out as an effort to keep homeowners associations from adopting restrictive covenants prohibiting clotheslines…I…think we ought to let cities and counties to elect local ordinances that govern these types of things, I don’t think the state should have an umbrella ordinance for clotheslines…we just can’t legislate everything,” said Sen. Malcolm Graham.” And then it began to get frivolous: “Is there any kind of a dress code required when you’re hanging out your clothes,” asked a Senator. The question was a sideswipe at what was being whispered around the committee table: who wants to see their neighbors’ unmentionables?...After one outburst of laughter, Committee Chairman R.C. Soles said, ‘Alright, this is serious business,’ tapping his gavel on the table. That got more chuckles and prompted at least one committee member to remark, ‘Oh, yeah, this is serious business.’ The bill was voted down on a voice vote…The Bill’s sponsor said: “It’s been a real problem for folks who feel pretty adamantly they want to use clotheslines…It’s their small step that they can take toward global warming issues.”

In Luke 6:24-26, when the Pharisees objected to the Disciples gathering grain on the Sabbath, Jesus stated a series of woes upon them: "But woe to you who are rich…Woe to you who are well fed now…Woe To You Who Laugh Now, For You Will Mourn And Weep…” Jesus did not look kindly on those given to frivolity, ridicule, judgment and oppression. In Ecclesiastes 3:1-9, there is a series of ”There is a time for…” phrases: “There is a time for everything…under heaven: a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot…A Time To Weep And A Time To Laugh, a time to mourn and a time to dance…a time to be silent and a time to speak…a time for war and a time for peace.” We are living in serious and dreadful times. The issue is not so much partisan politics – but – whatever happened to basic and common sense. We cannot afford frivolous, reckless and meaningless debate. When there is an impending wreck, one would be wise to apply the brakes and stop! However, some might think of it as a time to discuss and fund the building of wider roads with substantial barriers in the medians. Setting as a priority: “How Dry I Am” and if or what one hangs on a clothesline. Distorted and Frivolous Priorities for sure! Consider these things with me!

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Shrub-Drubbing

From My Perspective - - -

What should one do when surrounded by the consequences of one’s own actions? Is there ever a time for reality to set and responsibility to be accepted? When trying to avoid responsibility, what is the response in terms of the calamity at hand? In the area of politics, one resorts to “Shrub-Drubbing” (or “Bush-Bashing”)! For the next four or eight years, every negative experience imaginable is not the fault of the current office holders – it is because of the ineptness and incompetence of the previous administration. This becomes an interesting rallying cry even though there is diminishing evidence to that effect – factualness matters little in the “blame-game”!

Mortimer Zuckerman, chairman and editor in chief of U.S. News & World Report has an article in the Wall Street Journal today. In it, he allows: “The recent unemployment numbers have undermined confidence that we might be nearing the bottom of the recession. What we can see on the surface is disconcerting enough, but the inside numbers are just as bad. The Bureau of Labor Statistics preliminary estimate for job losses for June is 467,000, which means 7.2 million people have lost their jobs since the start of the recession. The cumulative job losses over the last six months have been greater than for any other half year period since World War II, including the military demobilization after the war… Here are 10 reasons we are in even more trouble than the 9.5% unemployment rate indicates: (1) June's total assumed 185,000 people at work who probably were not. The government could not identify them; it made an assumption about trends…(2) More companies are asking employees to take unpaid leave. These people don't count on the unemployment roll. (3) No fewer than 1.4 million people wanted or were available for work in the last 12 months but were not counted. Why? Because they hadn't searched for work in the four weeks preceding the survey. (4) The number of workers taking part-time jobs due to the slack economy, a kind of stealth underemployment, has doubled in this recession to about nine million…Add those whose hours have been cut to those who cannot find a full-time job and the total unemployed rises to 16.5%, putting the number of involuntarily idle in the range of 25 million. (5) The average work week for rank-and-file employees in the private sector, roughly 80% of the work force, slipped to 33 hours…and factories are operating at only 65% of capacity. (6) The average length of official unemployment increased to 24.5 weeks…(7) The average worker saw no wage gains in June, with average compensation running flat at $18.53 an hour. (8) The goods producing sector is losing the most jobs…(9) The prospects for job creation are equally distressing. The likelihood is that when economic activity picks up, employers will first choose to increase hours for existing workers and bring part-time workers back to full time. Many unemployed workers looking for jobs once the recovery begins will discover that jobs as good as the ones they lost are almost impossible to find because many layoffs have been permanent. (10) Job losses may last well into 2010 to hit an unemployment peak close to 11%. That unemployment rate may be sustained for an extended period. No wonder poll after poll shows a steady erosion of confidence in the stimulus. So what kind of second-act stimulus should we look for? Something that might have a real multiplier effect, not a congressional wish list of pet programs. It is critical that the Obama administration not play politics with the issue. The time to get ready for a serious infrastructure program is now. It's a shame Washington didn't get it right the first time…”

In Matthew 7:24-29, Jesus addresses the subject of “Foundations” – the difference it makes if one wisely builds on rock versus the one who persists and foolishly chooses to build on sand. Regrettably, as our nation’s infra-structure continues to erode and crumble, we have those who choosing sand foundations rather than rock. In Psalm 11:3, a question is posed: “When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?" In the political arena, it is blame, bash and spend some more! In the spiritual arena, it is to pray, encourage and to be as charitable as possible. Some can choose to ignore and disbelieve that in the midst of our inadequacy, we can seek the Lord and bask in His all-sufficiency! Consider these things with me!

Friday, July 10, 2009

Malady and Malaise

From My Perspective - - -

In several areas of our culture, there appears to be a departure from a sense of appreciation for others and their achievements; a readiness to embrace ridicule and demeaning of fellow human beings; a willingness to caricature certain strata of our society (ethnic and gender groups, occupations, nations, etc.). It’s easy to detect in current examples when news reports speak of the adulation of and for Michael Jackson on the one hand, and the ridicule and demeaning of Sarah Palin (and her children) on the other hand. Somewhere along the way, misdirection has allowed for the diminution of respect, fairness and acceptance of each other. There may be merit – if understood and applied appropriately - in the adage “live and let live” that would be helpful in our world today.

There’s a story of the old preacher who announced to his parish overseers that he would have to leave his congregation due to a widespread Malady and Malaise. When pressed to amplify, he was forced to admit and state – actually – they were Sick and Tired of him and no longer wanted him to continue. While that is meant as humor, in the area of spiritual impact in our culture, the overall Malady and Malaise prevails. The role and place of religion is diminishing more and more in our nation and culture. Several examples come to mind from recent days: (1) The President of the United States serves, in a sense, as a role model. However, he cannot find a church where he and his family can attend for regular worship; (2) The National Day of Prayer came and went with very little attention given to it by our political leaders; (3) The God and Country Family Festival in Nampa, Idaho, applied to the Pentagon for the flyover but was denied because the Pentagon prohibited support of special interest groups. The official statement was: “it violates a Pentagon policy against supporting any event that provides a selective benefit to any individual, group, or organization, including any religious or sectarian organization, ideological movement, political campaign or organization, or commercial enterprise, to include a shopping mall or motion picture promotion." However, the Flyovers have taken place at this festival for the past 42 years.

In thinking about spiritual impact, the drift away from the foundations and moorings of national focus on The Eternal God is no recent phenomenon. There is an interesting observation in Jeremiah 5:30-31, “A horrible and shocking thing has happened in the land: The prophets prophesy lies, the priests rule by their own authority, and my people love it this way. But what will you do in the end?” There are three observations being made: (1) there is Deception; (2) there is usurpation of authority; (3) the people demonstrate naivetĆ© and/or gullibility and embrace this departure wholeheartedly. Proper Assessment and drastic action are called for in Deuteronomy 13:1-5, “Suppose there are prophets among you, or those who have dreams about the future, and they promise you signs or miracles, and the predicted signs or miracles take place. If the prophets then say, Come, let us worship the gods of foreign nations, do not listen to them. The LORD your God is testing you to see if you love him with all your heart and soul. Serve only the LORD your God and fear him alone. Obey his commands, listen to his voice, and cling to him. The false prophets or dreamers who try to lead you astray must be put to death, for they encourage rebellion against the LORD your God, who brought you out of slavery in the land of Egypt. Since they try to keep you from following the LORD your God, you must execute them to remove the evil from among you.” Execution is not the suggestion for today, but realistic assessment should be our national concern.

Many people suggest their sense of a national Malady and Malaise. They are becoming sick and tired in terms of the culture and national direction. The point is – What Will YOU Do About It? Will you remain silent, or merely complain to your peer group – or – will you become engaged and involved in helping this nation and culture become re-focused? Or, have you become lulled like the people of Jeremiah’s day allowing yourself to become numbered with - “…my people love it this way…”? Consider these things with me!

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Dollars Making No-Cents/Some-Sense

From My Perspective - - -

Stimulus #1: $787 Billion. Needed – Stimulus #2 (the President hasn’t said how much it should be – just that we need more spending)! Problem – Senator Harry Reed stated we have yet to spend almost 90% of Stimulus #1. Stimulus #1 was supposed to fund “shovel-ready” infra-structure projects. This sounded logical and workable – but – it really hasn’t happened. Texas congressman Louis Gohmert (R 1st Dist.) offered a novel approach last year. He floated an idea of allowing the American people to go one full month without paying any federal income or payroll taxes. The idea was that they would then spend this money and stimulate the economy. When President Obama started talking about the $787 billion dollar stimulus the following could’ve been factored in. It seems that $787 billion is almost exactly equal to the amount of federal income, Social Security and Medicare taxes withheld from American paychecks over a six-month period. What if we had not a one-month tax holiday, but a six month tax holiday? How about letting people keep almost their entire paychecks for one-half of a year?

A co-author of the book on: Fair Tax suggests “…two possible scenarios our politicians had to work with: (1) Borrow the $787 billion and let the politicians decide how it is going to be spent to stimulate our economy, or (2) Give the producers (tax-payers) a six month period in which they owe no federal income or payroll taxes. For these six months they get to keep their checks. This puts $787 billion into the hands of American workers - American producers - to spend and invest. There is one huge difference between the two plans. Under the government spending scenario the politicians get to decide how the money is spent. In other words, they get the power. Remember…power is the goal. Politicians want to decide which road is built, which park is refurbished, and which research project gets additional funding. Every one of these decisions would be made based on the political capital it will generate. Under the tax holiday plan the people, not the politicians, get to cast the ballots/dollars. Spending choices would not be made on the basis of political expediency, but on the free choices of the people. Businesses that delivered a good product and good customer service would get the votes, not politicians who delivered a pork project to their districts…”

The choices for our Congress and nation should be obvious: (1) Fiscal Discipline even when Restraints have been removed; (2) Stability even when Recklessness is the order of the day; (3) Frugalness even when the Vault is left open and the Treasury Printing Presses are running 24/7. The last six months of the previous administration and the first six months of the present administration has moved us to being a debtor nation. We are moving from strength to weakness. We are moving from being a respected nation to one that is being ridiculed. Dr. Anne Wortham is the black author of "The Other Side of Racism: A Philosophical Study of Black Race Consciousness". She is Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University and continuing Visiting Scholar at Stanford University 's Hoover Institution. On November 6, 2008 she wrote: “…So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a black man to the office of the president of the United States, the wounded giant of the world…The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a black person. So, toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good. There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness…”

All of this reminds one of the indicting words to a Church in Revelation 3:17,22 - You say, 'I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.' But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked.” The appeal is: “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." The Nation needs to listen and hear as well. Consider these things with me!

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Leadership Lunacy

From My Perspective - - -

Royalty always presents one with considerable intrigue and many more questions than there are answers. A case in point is King Ludwig II of Bavaria. It was said, “King Ludwig II (1845-86) lived a mysterious life and died young, tragically and misunderstood. He loved beauty in all its forms, especially, nature, art and music. Ludwig, a pacifist, was forced to declare war on Prussia and soon after became a recluse in his dream world and used the royal fortune to build one castle after another and indulged his favorite composer, Wagner, with a huge allowance, until he was declared insane by his own family and ministers. He was taken away in a straitjacket in the middle of the night from his greatest achievement, Neuschwanstein castle, and locked up in Berg castle on Lake Starnberg. Soon after, he was found dead, supposedly drowned in knee-deep water together with his doctor. The real cause of King Ludwig's death has been a mystery ever since his body, together with that of his psychiatrist, was dragged from Lake Starnberg on 13 June, 1886.”

Part of the frustration with the King was his propensity to spend huge sums of money (that Bavaria did not have) on projects that were impractical or not needed. “The official version holds that the Bavarian government was driven to depose the reclusive Ludwig because he was squandering vast sums of money on bizarre building projects that were driving his kingdom to ruin.” Bernhard von Gudden, his psychiatrist, diagnosed him as suffering from paranoia, a condition which today would be classified as schizophrenia. Ludwig was deprived of his crown and, according to the official version, he reacted by drowning himself in Lake Starnberg in a fit of paranoid pique (a state of vexation caused by a perceived slight or indignity; a feeling of wounded pride).” “Murder theorists counter with recent medical evidence which suggests that the king was, in fact, suffering from a form of meningitis and was far from insane. They say fishermen reported hearing shots at the time of Ludwig's death and claim that his opponents in the Bavarian government hired assassins to kill him as he was trying to flee across the lake. They say that Von Gudden, who was also found dead in the lake, was shot because he was a witness. To date, the Wittelsbach family has dismissed all murder theories and refused point blank to have the king's body exhumed. The latest attempt to persuade them to change their minds comes from the Berlin historian and author, Peter Glowasz, who wants to employ Swiss scientists to examine the corpse by giving it a computer tomography. He insists that while the procedure would not touch the body, it would show up any gunshot wounds.” Ah, the intrigue!

This can cause one to wonder whether or not the Congress of the United States is of sound mind when they recklessly approve (without reading the proposed legislation) expenditures on things we cannot afford and do not need. This is not to suggest that politicians need to be removed from office in a straightjacket – but – there is room for pause regarding the soundness of their acumen (quickness, accuracy, and keenness of judgment or insight) based on their recent actions and majority vote! One inwardly wishes there was an adult somewhere in our government that would effect restraint. The populace was mesmerized by rhetoric and promise for change. However, few considered the ramifications of lofty rhetoric or the inexperienced making the changes. The idea of the Chief of Staff and his: “Never let a good crisis go to waste!” is impulse at best and irresponsible at worst. The Vice-President, in an idle moment of an interview, allowed they had miscalculated in terms of the financial plight of the nation!

A Biblical Principle is given in Luke 14:28-30, "Suppose one of you wants to build a tower. Will he not first sit down and estimate the cost to see if he has enough money to complete it? For if he lays the foundation and is not able to finish it, everyone who sees it will ridicule him, saying, This fellow began to build and was not able to finish.” Bloviating and bluffing with rhetoric won’t get the job done. It’s time to begin praying towards the deposing of the current crew of nabobs in the next election and find people of sound mind and judgment who may be able to lead us out of the present morass – people less interested in themselves and their vested interests and more concerned for their constituents. Consider these things with me.

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Independent Of Independence?

From My Perspective - - -

The Patriot Post shares with us: Independence Day 2009: We still hold these truths...and begins with a Prayer by Patrick Henry: "Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" With that foundation, core value, inspiration, courage and commitment, our nation was born!

The Patriot Post includes Background History: On July 4th, 1776, our Founders, assembled as representatives to the Second Continental Congress, issued a declaration stating most notably: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…" In other words, our Founders affirmed that our rights, which are inherent by Natural Law as provided by our Creator, can't be arbitrarily alienated by men like England's King George III, who believed that the rights of men are the gifts of government. Our Founders publicly declared their intentions to defend these rights by attaching their signatures between July 4th and August 2nd of 1776 to the Declaration. They and their fellow Patriots pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor as they set about to defend the Natural Rights of man. At the conclusion of the American War for Independence in 1783, our Founders determined the new nation needed a more suitable alliance among the states than the Articles of Confederation. After much deliberation, they proposed the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1787, ratified in 1788 and implemented in 1789 as subordinate guidance to our Declaration of Independence. Since that time, generations of American Patriots have laid down their lives "to support and defend" our Constitution…

Some lessons are difficult to remember, and many benefits of freedom suffer from neglect or disregard. The Founding Fathers knew this all too well and anticipated such behavior, movement and acceptance of loss of freedom. Our Declaration's author, Thomas Jefferson, understood the odds. He wrote, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground," and he concluded, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Accordingly, George Washington advised, "We should never despair, our Situation before has been unpromising and has changed for the better, so I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new Exertions and proportion our Efforts to the exigency of the times." A focus and prayer on this Independence Day might well be from two of the stanzas in America, The Beautiful:
O beautiful for pilgrim feet Whose stern impassioned stress
A thoroughfare of freedom beat Across the wilderness!
America! America! God mend thine every flaw,
Confirm thy soul in self-control, Thy liberty in law!

O beautiful for heroes proved In liberating strife.
Who more than self their country loved And mercy more than life!
America! America! May God thy gold refine
Till all success be nobleness And every gain divine!

An outstanding King of Israel prayed – I Chronicles 29:10-12, “David praised the Lord in the presence of the whole assembly, saying, Praise be to you, O Lord, God of our fathers, from everlasting to everlasting. Yours, O Lord, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the majesty and the splendor, for everything in heaven and earth is yours. Yours, O Lord, is the kingdom; you are exalted as head over all. Wealth and honor come from you; you are the ruler of all things. In your hands are strength and power to exalt and give strength to all." We would do well to remember these truths. Consider these things with me!

Friday, July 3, 2009

Language Weaponry

From My Perspective - - -

Language serves a very useful purpose. How it is used can either clarify or obscure; compliment or insult; amplify or cause ambiguity. Google News has a lead article today by Christopher Hawthorne, Architecture Critic who is commenting about Michael Jackson and Neverland. It is clever and skillful writing but not without the caustic and biting comment. He writes: “It was while I was bumpily making my way across a rope bridge in a quiet corner of Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch on Thursday morning, next to an elaborate tree-house crowned with a ship's wheel, and overlooking a bronze sculpture of smiling children, that I finally figured out what the late entertainer's compound represents from an architectural point of view. Jackson didn't commission Neverland's Tudor-style main house…But the changes Jackson made to the 2,600-acre property over the years, notably adding a slew of kid-friendly attractions, markedly changed the place,…At the height of his popularity, Jackson bent the music industry toward an androgynous, perpetually childlike model of superstardom. He managed a similar trick in transforming the architecture of this classic Santa Barbara County ranch property…” Key to this paragraph is the use of the word “androgynous”! Is it a compliment or an insult? Does it define the person and place or accuse? “ANDROGYNOUS” means: “Biology: Having both female and male characteristics; Being neither distinguishably masculine nor feminine, as in dress, appearance, or behavior.”

Herman Cain, WSB Radio in Atlanta, GA is attempting to either excite or incite the citizenry of this country to become part of the INTELLIGENT THINKERS MOVEMENT”! The summary objective is: "When They Feel the Heat, They Will See the Light"! His purpose is stated as: “The voice of ‘we the people’ has been hijacked by partisan politics, government bureaucrats, and the influence of money on elections and legislation. To take back our government, we must be able to un-elect members of Congress on a timely basis, and dramatically influence their decisions while they are in office. Because of the proliferation of biased media reporting, gullible voters, and too many in Congress who willingly and intentionally make deceptive and misleading statements about proposed legislation, “we the people” must be able to provide succinct and intelligent feedback to Congress frequently and persistently. We can then hold them accountable intelligently at election time, which is our only leverage for holding their feet to the fire. We don’t need all 306 million citizens to be successful. We only need 100,000 voters per Congressional district for them to ‘see the light’. ‘We The People’ can and will take back our government and the strategic direction of this Nation. It is our right and responsibility. This is NOT a republican, democrat, libertarian, conservative, liberal, or progressives movement. This is a ‘We The People’ movement.”

Tomorrow, we celebrate the 233rd Anniversary of the Birth of this nation. Many believe the nation is in rapid decline and is being euthanized by socialist-minded politicians and organizations. To say our liberties are being rapidly eroded is an understatement. The “change” people thought they were voting for has become an onslaught on the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that was part of the genius at the birth of this nation. Someone has described it like watching in slow-motion a tsunami approaching; a nuclear bomb in descent and timed to detonate; a volcano erupting; a tornado approaching… There can be little room to doubt that we are standing on a precipice and the ground beneath our feet is starting to crumble. A Preacher from another day stated: “My subject deals with time and eternity, and the preparation we must make in time for eternity – based on a text in Amos 4:12: "Prepare to meet thy God." The Patriots of old championed Liberty for all! The Civil Rights Movement championed Freedom for all! The current wars in which we are engaged champions Democracy for all. Galatians 5:1 states the spiritual heart-cry for us as we approach our “independence Day”, namely: “It is for freedom/liberty that Christ has set us free. Stand firm…and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.” Consider these things with me!

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Mindless or Brain Dead

From My Perspective - - -

At a time when the world is barraged with data and a variety of information, it seems as though few are able to comprehend and/or absorb all that is being communicated. This may be a reason why many in Congress do not bother to read the mammoth amount of legislative proposals for which they vote. It has a way of producing those who can be categorized as (a) Mindless, or (b) Brain Dead. The Mindless Person is: “Not endued with mind or intellectual powers; stupid; unthinking; inattentive; heedless; careless.” It is a mental indifference based upon either gullibility or lack of concern. To designate one as being “Brain Dead” is both cynical and caustic. Such a one is viewed with: “complete cessation of brain function as evidenced by absence of brain-wave activity…”

In terms of the “Mindless”, Thomas Sowell - Syndicated Columnist, under the byline: “Equality On Trial” wrote on July 1, 2009 the following thoughts: “For the fourth time in six cases, the Supreme Court of the United States has reversed a decision for which Judge Sonia Sotomayor voted on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. If this nominee were a white male, would this not raise questions about whether he should be elevated to a court that has found his previous decisions wrong two-thirds of the times when those decisions have been reviewed? Is no one supposed to ask questions about qualifications, simply because this nominee is Hispanic and a woman? Have we become that mindless? Qualifications are not simply a question of how long you have been doing something, but how well you have done it. Judge Sotomayor has certainly been on the federal bench long enough, but is being reversed four out of six times a sign of a job well done? Would longevity be equated with qualifications anywhere else? Some sergeants have been in the army longer than some generals -- but nobody thinks that is a reason to make those sergeants generals. Performance matters. And Judge Sotomayor's performance provides no reason for putting her on the Supreme Court. Although the case of the Connecticut firefighters is the latest and best-known of Judge Sotomayor's reversals by the Supreme Court, an even more revealing case was Didden v. Village of Port Chester, where the Supreme Court openly rebuked the unanimous three-judge panel that included Judge Sotomayor for "an evident denial of the most elementary forms of procedural due process…"

His point suggests the absence of thought and sound judgment in terms of the pending appointment, approval, and elevation to the highest court in the nation. To suggest either racial or gender discrimination only magnifies how easily such choices and decisions can fall into the “Mindless” category. A person should be measured by his or her Constitutional interpretation and adherence in terms of the Law, as well as rationality, equity and fairness in the administration and application of the Constitution free from anything external – racial, gender, social engineering issues. It is good to have a Statue Lady Justice – and her blindfold that suggests and represents equal justice under the law. An interesting statement is made in Wikipedia: “Blind Justice is the theory that law should be viewed objectively with the determination of innocence or guilt made without bias or prejudice. It is the idea behind the United States Supreme Court motto - Equal Justice Under Law - and is symbolized by the blindfolded statue of Lady Justice which is the symbol of the judiciary…Lady Justice is well-known for her clear sightedness. She typically holds a sword in one hand and scales in the other. The scales that she holds represent the impartiality with which justice is served and the sword signifies the power that is held by those making the decision…”

A Christian Worldview embraces that the follower of Christ should be neither mindless or brain-dead. Two significant thoughts in this regard: (1) Philippians 2:5-8, “Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus…He made Himself of no reputation…He humbled Himself…”, and (b) Romans 8:5-7, “… those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit…” The one who is neither mindless or brain-dead is the one who is Christ Centered, and Spirit Conscious. While some would mock and ridicule these truths, they cannot disapprove or disavow them. As a nation, we’ve tried! We are long past due to return to the Lord! Consider these things with me!